[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1479663476.8455.369.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 09:37:56 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: fgao@...ai8.com
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kaber@...sh.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
gfree.wind@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] driver: macvlan: Remove duplicated IFF_UP
condition check in macvlan_forward_source_one
On Sun, 2016-11-20 at 19:21 +0800, fgao@...ai8.com wrote:
> From: Gao Feng <gfree.wind@...il.com>
>
> The condition check "dev->flags & IFF_UP" is duplicated in
> macvlan_forward_source_one, because its caller macvlan_forward_source
> has already checked this flag.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gao Feng <gfree.wind@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/macvlan.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/macvlan.c b/drivers/net/macvlan.c
> index 13b7e0b..95a5ffc 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/macvlan.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/macvlan.c
> @@ -375,9 +375,6 @@ static void macvlan_forward_source_one(struct sk_buff *skb,
> int ret;
>
> dev = vlan->dev;
> - if (unlikely(!(dev->flags & IFF_UP)))
> - return;
> -
> nskb = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (!nskb)
> return;
If you don't mind, I would rather remove the test in the caller and
leave it here. It is likely compiler inlines the function anyway, so
there is no performance change.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists