lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1611221656390.8214@east.gentwo.org>
Date:   Tue, 22 Nov 2016 17:04:37 -0600 (CST)
From:   Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To:     "Vishwanathapura, Niranjana" <niranjana.vishwanathapura@...el.com>
cc:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
        Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 02/10] IB/hfi-vnic: Virtual Network Interface Controller
 (VNIC) Bus driver

On Tue, 22 Nov 2016, Vishwanathapura, Niranjana wrote:

> Ok, I do understand Jason's point that we should probably not put this driver
> under drivers/infiniband/sw/.., as this driver is not a HCA.
> It is an ULP similar to ipoib, built on top of Omni-path irrespective of
> whether we register a hfi_vnic_bus or a direct custom interface with HFI1.
> This ULP will transmit and recieve Omni-path packets over the fabric, and is
> dependent on IB MAD interface and the HFI1 driver.

This is something that encapsulates IP (v4 right?) in something else.
Would belong into

	linux/net/ipv4

You already have similar implementations there

See f.e. ipip.c, ip_tunnel.c and lots more (try
	ls linux/net/ipv4/*tunnel*

)

If this is more like a device then it would belong into

linux/drivers/net/hfi or so (see also linux/drivers/net/ppp, plip,
loopback, etc etc)



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ