[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1611221656390.8214@east.gentwo.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 17:04:37 -0600 (CST)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: "Vishwanathapura, Niranjana" <niranjana.vishwanathapura@...el.com>
cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 02/10] IB/hfi-vnic: Virtual Network Interface Controller
(VNIC) Bus driver
On Tue, 22 Nov 2016, Vishwanathapura, Niranjana wrote:
> Ok, I do understand Jason's point that we should probably not put this driver
> under drivers/infiniband/sw/.., as this driver is not a HCA.
> It is an ULP similar to ipoib, built on top of Omni-path irrespective of
> whether we register a hfi_vnic_bus or a direct custom interface with HFI1.
> This ULP will transmit and recieve Omni-path packets over the fabric, and is
> dependent on IB MAD interface and the HFI1 driver.
This is something that encapsulates IP (v4 right?) in something else.
Would belong into
linux/net/ipv4
You already have similar implementations there
See f.e. ipip.c, ip_tunnel.c and lots more (try
ls linux/net/ipv4/*tunnel*
)
If this is more like a device then it would belong into
linux/drivers/net/hfi or so (see also linux/drivers/net/ppp, plip,
loopback, etc etc)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists