[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5835B80D.80307@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 07:38:53 -0800
From: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: Zhang Shengju <zhangshengju@...s.chinamobile.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [net] rtnetlink: fix the wrong minimal dump size getting from
rtnl_calcit()
On 11/21/16, 10:14 PM, Zhang Shengju wrote:
> For RT netlink, calcit() function should return the minimal size for
> netlink dump message. This will make sure that dump message for every
> network device can be stored.
>
> Currently, rtnl_calcit() function doesn't account the size of header of
> netlink message, this patch will fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Shengju <zhangshengju@...s.chinamobile.com>
> ---
> net/core/rtnetlink.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> index f4b9350..09e115b 100644
> --- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> +++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> @@ -2734,7 +2734,7 @@ static u16 rtnl_calcit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh)
> ext_filter_mask));
> }
>
> - return min_ifinfo_dump_size;
> + return nlmsg_total_size(min_ifinfo_dump_size);
> }
>
> static int rtnl_dump_all(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
This looks fine to me. However, looking at the git log, since this code has been
around for so long, it seems like it can go into net-next. But, that's just my 2c.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists