netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] ipv6: sr: add option to control lwtunnel support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5835613D.8070104@uclouvain.be>
Date:   Wed, 23 Nov 2016 10:28:29 +0100
From:   David Lebrun <david.lebrun@...ouvain.be>
To:     Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
CC:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@...gle.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] ipv6: sr: add option to control lwtunnel
 support

On 11/23/2016 08:34 AM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
> I can't seem to reproduce the problem you are seeing. still trying..
> I don't have CONFIG_LWTUNNEL set nor any of the other SEG6 configs.
> My CONFIG_IPV6 is on and compiled as a module. I have also tried disabling it.
> If you can send me the config, I can try again. Looking back at the patches,
> I do see a few things below ..but they may not fix your problem directly.
> 
> Though I had none of the ipv6 segment routing configs turned on,
> I do see the "Segment Routing with IPv6" msg at bootup.
> Was looking at david's patches again, and a few things (I had missed seeing the last version):
> 
> In my review comment I was hinting at CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6 to cover all of ipv6 segment routing,
> including the lwtunnel bits.
> 
> something like below:
> 
> config IPV6_SEG6
>         bool "IPv6: Segment Routing Header encapsulation support"
>         depends on LWTUNNEL && IPV6
> 
> DavidL, do you see a problem doing it this way ?. with this 'seg6.o' will be part of CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6 and not
> get initialized unless it is enabled..which seems like the right thing to do.

Can't reproduce the bug either, with CONFIG_IPV6=y, LWTUNNEL=n and all
SEG6 disabled. Alexei, your .config and dmesg log could help.

Roopa, the reason why seg6.o is compiled by default is that it provides
an interface to control HMAC structures, and that HMAC does not depends
on lwtunnels and can be used in the extension header processing (which
is compiled by default). I could indeed add another option to
conditionnally compile seg6.o if HMAC is enabled etc, and I actually had
something like that in the very first versions of the patch, but I
received comments that too much options is not a good thing (and I agree
with that).

Anyway, I do not see how seg6.o could possibly generate such a bug given
the only thing it does is register a genetlink family and pernet ops
that allocate/deallocate a struct. Genetlink is compiled by default with
NET and register_pernet_subsys does not fail even when namespaces
support is disabled.

David

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (164 bytes)