[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161124153809.GA20455@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 16:38:09 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Yegor Yefremov <yegorslists@...glemail.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
"N, Mugunthan V" <mugunthanvnm@...com>,
Rami Rosen <roszenrami@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cpsw: ethtool: add support for getting/setting EEE
registers
> As for enabling advertising and correct working of cpsw do you mean it
> would be better to disable EEE in any PHY on cpsw initialization as
> long as cpsw doesn't provide support for EEE?
>
> We observe some strange behavior with our gigabit PHYs and a link
> partner in a EEE-capable unmanaged NetGear switch. Disabling
> advertising seems to help. Though we're still investigating the issue.
Hi Florian
Am i right in saying, a PHY should not advertise EEE until the MAC
driver calls phy_init_eee(), indicating the MAC supports EEE?
If so, it looks like we need to change a few of the PHY drivers, in
particular, the bcm-*.c.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists