[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0835B3720019904CB8F7AA43166CEEB201055ED8@RTITMBSV03.realtek.com.tw>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 13:26:55 +0000
From: Hayes Wang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>
To: Mark Lord <mlord@...ox.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: nic_swsd <nic_swsd@...ltek.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net 1/2] r8152: fix the sw rx checksum is unavailable
Mark Lord [mailto:mlord@...ox.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2016 8:31 PM
[...]
> Nope. Guard zones did not fix it, so it's probably not a prefetch issue.
> Oddly, adding a couple of memory barriers to specific places in the driver
> does help, A LOT. Still not 100%, but it did pass 1800 reboot tests over night
> with only three bad rx_desc's reported.
>
> That's a new record here for the driver using kmalloc'd buffers,
> and put reliability on par with using non-cacheable buffers.
>
> Any way we look at it though, the chip/driver are simply unreliable,
> and relying upon hardware checksums (which fail due to the driver
> looking at garbage rather than the checksum bits) leads to data corruption.
I don't think the garbage results from our driver or device.
If it is the issue about memory, I think the host driver ought
to deal with it, because it handles the DMA.
Besides, it doesn't seem to occur for all platforms. I have
tested the iperf more than 26 hours, and it still works fine.
I think I would get the same result on x86 or x86_64 platform.
Best Regards,
Hayes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists