[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <94f1ef0f-2a48-099c-d91f-7057fb474a27@pobox.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 07:36:57 -0500
From: Mark Lord <mlord@...ox.com>
To: Hayes Wang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: nic_swsd <nic_swsd@...ltek.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] r8152: fix the sw rx checksum is unavailable
On 16-11-25 01:11 AM, Hayes Wang wrote:
> Mark Lord [mailto:mlord@...ox.com]
..
>> If that "return 0" statement is ever executed, doesn't it result
>> in the loss/leak of a buffer?
>
> They would be found back by calling rtl_start_rx(), when the rx
> is restarted.
Good. I figured it was probably something like that, but wasn't
entirely sure about the control flow around stop/restart there.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists