netdev - Re: net: GPF in eth

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iJeWV9YnOzy4eXL4Sbcyw_kj_CA8JrfGaFxMse_MUFL6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 26 Nov 2016 10:28:04 -0800
From:   Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To:     Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>,
        Alexander Duyck <aduyck@...antis.com>,
        Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
        Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>,
        Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: net: GPF in eth_header

On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The following program triggers GPF in eth_header:
>
> https://gist.githubusercontent.com/dvyukov/613cadf05543b55a419f237e419cd495/raw/5471231523d1a07c3de55f11f87472c2816ee06c/gistfile1.txt
>
> On commit 16ae16c6e5616c084168740990fc508bda6655d4 (Nov 24).
>
> BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffed002d14d74a
> IP: [<ffffffff86be3295>] eth_header+0x75/0x260 net/ethernet/eth.c:88
> PGD 7fff6067 [   50.787819] PUD 7fff5067
> PMD 0 [   50.787819]
> Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC KASAN
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 2 PID: 6712 Comm: a.out Not tainted 4.9.0-rc6+ #55
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
> task: ffff88003a1841c0 task.stack: ffff880034d08000
> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff86be3295>]  [<ffffffff86be3295>]
> eth_header+0x75/0x260 net/ethernet/eth.c:88
> RSP: 0018:ffff880034d0eb68  EFLAGS: 00010a03
> RAX: 1ffff1002d14d74a RBX: ffff880168a6ba4a RCX: ffff88006a9c7858
> RDX: 000000000000dd86 RSI: dffffc0000000000 RDI: ffff880168a6ba56
> RBP: ffff880034d0eb98 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000031
> R10: 0000000000000002 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
> R13: ffff88006c208d80 R14: 00000000000086dd R15: ffff88006a9c7858
> FS:  0000000001a02940(0000) GS:ffff88006d000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: ffffed002d14d74a CR3: 0000000037373000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
> Stack:
>  000000316881ab40 ffff88006a9c76c0 ffff88006881ab40 ffff88006a9c77f8
>  0000000000000000 dffffc0000000000 ffff880034d0ee98 ffffffff86b31af9
>  ffffffff8719605c ffff880034d0f0f8 ffffffff000086dd ffffffff86be3220
> Call Trace:
>  [<     inline     >] dev_hard_header ./include/linux/netdevice.h:2762
>  [<ffffffff86b31af9>] neigh_resolve_output+0x659/0xb20 net/core/neighbour.c:1302
>  [<     inline     >] dst_neigh_output ./include/net/dst.h:464
>  [<ffffffff8719605c>] ip6_finish_output2+0xb3c/0x2500 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:121
>  [<ffffffff871a0b0b>] ip6_finish_output+0x2eb/0x760 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:139
>  [<     inline     >] NF_HOOK_COND ./include/linux/netfilter.h:246
>  [<ffffffff871a1157>] ip6_output+0x1d7/0x9a0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:153
>  [<     inline     >] dst_output ./include/net/dst.h:501
>  [<ffffffff873312ea>] ip6_local_out+0x9a/0x180 net/ipv6/output_core.c:170
>  [<ffffffff871a3886>] ip6_send_skb+0xa6/0x340 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1712
>  [<ffffffff871a3bd8>] ip6_push_pending_frames+0xb8/0xe0
> net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1732
>  [<     inline     >] rawv6_push_pending_frames net/ipv6/raw.c:607
>  [<ffffffff8722acfb>] rawv6_sendmsg+0x250b/0x2c20 net/ipv6/raw.c:920
>  [<ffffffff8701c4f5>] inet_sendmsg+0x385/0x590 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:734
>  [<     inline     >] sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:621
>  [<ffffffff86a6ea9f>] sock_sendmsg+0xcf/0x110 net/socket.c:631
>  [<ffffffff86a6ee0b>] sock_write_iter+0x32b/0x620 net/socket.c:829
>  [<ffffffff81a6f153>] do_iter_readv_writev+0x363/0x670 fs/read_write.c:695
>  [<ffffffff81a71ba1>] do_readv_writev+0x431/0x9b0 fs/read_write.c:872
>  [<ffffffff81a726dc>] vfs_writev+0x8c/0xc0 fs/read_write.c:911
>  [<ffffffff81a72825>] do_writev+0x115/0x2d0 fs/read_write.c:944
>  [<     inline     >] SYSC_writev fs/read_write.c:1017
>  [<ffffffff81a75fdc>] SyS_writev+0x2c/0x40 fs/read_write.c:1014
>  [<ffffffff8814cf85>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0xc6
> arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:209
> Code: 41 83 fe 04 0f 84 aa 00 00 00 e8 17 4e b0 fa 48 8d 7b 0c 48 be
> 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 44 89 f2 66 c1 c2 08 48 89 f8 48 c1 e8 03 <0f>
> b6 0c 30 48 8d 43 0d 49 89 c0 49 c1 e8 03 41 0f b6 34 30 49
> RIP  [<ffffffff86be3295>] eth_header+0x75/0x260 net/ethernet/eth.c:88
>  RSP <ffff880034d0eb68>
> CR2: ffffed002d14d74a
> ---[ end trace a73fedfdc11bd60c ]---


Hi Dmitry

I could not reproduce the issue. Might need some specific configuration...

loopback device has proper ethernet header (all 0)

Fault happens in :

0f b6 0c 30             movzbl (%rax,%rsi,1),%ecx

RAX=1ffff1002d14d74a  which is RDI>>3, and RSI=dffffc0000000000

Could this be a KASAN problem ?