[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1480245482-10357-1-git-send-email-fgao@ikuai8.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2016 19:18:02 +0800
From: fgao@...ai8.com
To: davem@...emloft.net, maheshb@...gle.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, gfree.wind@...il.com
Cc: Gao Feng <fgao@...ai8.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 1/1] driver: ipvlan: Use NF_IP_PRI_LAST as hook priority instead of INT_MAX
From: Gao Feng <fgao@...ai8.com>
It is better to use NF_IP_PRI_LAST instead of INT_MAX as hook priority.
The former is good at readability and easier to maintain.
Signed-off-by: Gao Feng <fgao@...ai8.com>
---
v2: Add the lost header file. It is added in local but not in v1 patch
v1: Inital patch
drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_main.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_main.c b/drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_main.c
index ab90b22..01c7446 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_main.c
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
*
*/
+#include "linux/netfilter_ipv4.h"
#include "ipvlan.h"
static u32 ipvl_nf_hook_refcnt = 0;
@@ -16,13 +17,13 @@
.hook = ipvlan_nf_input,
.pf = NFPROTO_IPV4,
.hooknum = NF_INET_LOCAL_IN,
- .priority = INT_MAX,
+ .priority = NF_IP_PRI_LAST,
},
{
.hook = ipvlan_nf_input,
.pf = NFPROTO_IPV6,
.hooknum = NF_INET_LOCAL_IN,
- .priority = INT_MAX,
+ .priority = NF_IP_PRI_LAST,
},
};
--
1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists