[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <583C2B19.7010506@iogearbox.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 14:03:21 +0100
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>, ast@...com
CC: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, roszenrami@...il.com,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf: cgroup: fix documentation of __cgroup_bpf_update()
On 11/28/2016 12:04 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
> There's a 'not' missing in one paragraph. Add it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>
> Reported-by: Rami Rosen <roszenrami@...il.com>
> Fixes: 3007098494be ("cgroup: add support for eBPF programs")
Small nit in subject: s/[PATCH]/[PATCH net-next]/
> kernel/bpf/cgroup.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> index a0ab43f..b708e6e 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> @@ -70,9 +70,9 @@ void cgroup_bpf_inherit(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cgroup *parent)
> * releases the one that is currently attached, if any. @prog is then made
> * the effective program of type @type in that cgroup.
> *
> - * If @prog is %NULL, the currently attached program of type @type is released,
> - * and the effective program of the parent cgroup (if any) is inherited to
> - * @cgrp.
> + * If @prog is not %NULL, the currently attached program of type @type is
> + * released, and the effective program of the parent cgroup (if any) is
> + * inherited to @cgrp.
Both paragraphs for __cgroup_bpf_update() currently say:
[...]
* If @prog is %NULL, this function attaches a new program to the cgroup and
* releases the one that is currently attached, if any. @prog is then made
* the effective program of type @type in that cgroup.
*
* If @prog is %NULL, the currently attached program of type @type is released,
* and the effective program of the parent cgroup (if any) is inherited to
* @cgrp.
[...]
It looks to me that you are 'fixing' the wrong location. First paragraph is
actually missing a "not", which would then also align with what the code does.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists