[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49e8d347d29c46d773db8dcf1b653894abc6490a.1480360512.git.g.nault@alphalink.fr>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 20:40:02 +0100
From: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@...halink.fr>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: James Chapman <jchapman@...alix.com>,
Chris Elston <celston@...alix.com>
Subject: [PATCH net 5/5] l2tp: fix address test in __l2tp_ip6_bind_lookup()
The '!(addr && ipv6_addr_equal(addr, laddr))' part of the conditional
matches if addr is NULL or if addr != laddr.
But the intend of __l2tp_ip6_bind_lookup() is to find a sockets with
the same address, so the ipv6_addr_equal() condition needs to be
inverted.
For better clarity and consistency with the rest of the expression, the
(!X || X == Y) notation is used instead of !(X && X != Y).
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@...halink.fr>
---
net/l2tp/l2tp_ip6.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/l2tp/l2tp_ip6.c b/net/l2tp/l2tp_ip6.c
index 4a86440..aa821cb 100644
--- a/net/l2tp/l2tp_ip6.c
+++ b/net/l2tp/l2tp_ip6.c
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static struct sock *__l2tp_ip6_bind_lookup(struct net *net,
if ((l2tp->conn_id == tunnel_id) &&
net_eq(sock_net(sk), net) &&
- !(addr && ipv6_addr_equal(addr, laddr)) &&
+ (!addr || ipv6_addr_equal(addr, laddr)) &&
(!sk->sk_bound_dev_if || !dif ||
sk->sk_bound_dev_if == dif))
goto found;
--
2.10.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists