netdev - RE: The ubufs->refcount maybe be subtracted twice when tun_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <34EFBCA9F01B0748BEB6B629CE643AE60B0A5826@szxeml561-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Date:   Tue, 29 Nov 2016 13:27:25 +0000
From:   wangyunjian <wangyunjian@...wei.com>
To:     Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        "mst@...hat.com" <mst@...hat.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     caihe <caihe@...wei.com>
Subject: RE: The ubufs->refcount maybe be subtracted twice when tun_get_user
 failed

Sorry, I didn't describe it clearly. In fact, the second subtraction happens in the function handle_tx,
when tun_get_user fails and zcopy_used is ture. Fllowing the steps:

static ssize_t tun_get_user(struct tun_struct *tun, struct tun_file *tfile,
                                  void *msg_control, struct iov_iter *from,
                                  int noblock) {
           ...

           if (zerocopy)
                     err = zerocopy_sg_from_iter(skb, from);
           else {
                     err = skb_copy_datagram_from_iter(skb, 0, from, len);
                     if (!err && msg_control) {
                              struct ubuf_info *uarg = msg_control;
                              uarg->callback(uarg, false);                       --> step 1, the ubufs->refcount is subtracted frist.
                     }
           }

           if (err) {
                     this_cpu_inc(tun->pcpu_stats->rx_dropped);
                     kfree_skb(skb);
                     return -EFAULT;
           }

           err = virtio_net_hdr_to_skb(skb, &gso, tun_is_little_endian(tun));
           if (err) {
                     this_cpu_inc(tun->pcpu_stats->rx_frame_errors);
                     kfree_skb(skb);
                     return -EINVAL;                                         -->step 2, return err.
           }
}

static void handle_tx(struct vhost_net *net)
{
	...
	/* TODO: Check specific error and bomb out unless ENOBUFS? */
	err = sock->ops->sendmsg(sock, &msg, len);
	if (unlikely(err < 0)) {
		if (zcopy_used) {
			vhost_net_ubuf_put(ubufs);                                        --> step 3, the ubufs->refcount will be subtracted twice, when sendmsg execution err.
			nvq->upend_idx = ((unsigned)nvq->upend_idx - 1)
				% UIO_MAXIOV;
		}
		vhost_discard_vq_desc(vq, 1);
		break;
	}
	...
}

-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Wang [mailto:jasowang@...hat.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 6:07 PM
To: wangyunjian; mst@...hat.com; netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: caihe
Subject: Re: The ubufs->refcount maybe be subtracted twice when tun_get_user failed



On 2016年11月29日 17:30, wangyunjian wrote:
> In function tun_get_user , the ubufs->refcount may be subtracted twice, when msg_control is true and zerocopy is false.
>
> About the below code:
>
> static ssize_t tun_get_user(struct tun_struct *tun, struct tun_file *tfile,
>                                  void *msg_control, struct iov_iter *from,
>                                  int noblock) {
>           ...
>
>           if (zerocopy)
>                     err = zerocopy_sg_from_iter(skb, from);
>           else {
>                     err = skb_copy_datagram_from_iter(skb, 0, from, len);
>                     if (!err && msg_control) {
>                              struct ubuf_info *uarg = msg_control;
>                              uarg->callback(uarg, false);                       --> the ubufs->refcount is subtracted frist.
>                     }
>           }
>
>           if (err) {
>                     this_cpu_inc(tun->pcpu_stats->rx_dropped);
>                     kfree_skb(skb);
>                     return -EFAULT;
>           }
>
>           err = virtio_net_hdr_to_skb(skb, &gso, tun_is_little_endian(tun));
>           if (err) {
>                     this_cpu_inc(tun->pcpu_stats->rx_frame_errors);
>                     kfree_skb(skb);
>                     return -EINVAL;                                   -->here, the ubufs->refcount will be subtracted twice, when virtio_net_hdr_to_skb execution err.
>           }

Just make sure I understand the problem. Since we don't set SKBTX_DEV_ZEROCOPY here if zerocopy is false, callback won't be even trigged in skb_release_data(). So we are in fact safe here?

Thanks

> switch (tun->flags & TUN_TYPE_MASK) {
>           case IFF_TUN:
>                     if (tun->flags & IFF_NO_PI) {
>                              switch (skb->data[0] & 0xf0) {
>                              case 0x40:
>                                       pi.proto = htons(ETH_P_IP);
>                                       break;
>                              case 0x60:
>                                       pi.proto = htons(ETH_P_IPV6);
>                                       break;
>                              default:
>                                       this_cpu_inc(tun->pcpu_stats->rx_dropped);
>                                       kfree_skb(skb);
>                                       return -EINVAL;                          --> this will also be subtracted twice.
>                              }
>                     }
>
>                     skb_reset_mac_header(skb);
>                     skb->protocol = pi.proto;
>                     skb->dev = tun->dev;
>                     break;
>           case IFF_TAP:
>                     skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, tun->dev);
>                     break;
>           }
> 		...
> }