[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c2ea35d1-302c-671e-f976-9bb7ccf56197@fb.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 14:50:15 -0500
From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <ast@...nel.org>, <jannh@...gle.com>,
<kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bpf: add test for the verifier equal logic bug
On 11/29/2016 02:06 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 11/29/2016 06:35 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
>> This is a test to verify that
>>
>> bpf: fix states equal logic for varlen access
>>
>> actually fixed the problem. The problem was if the register we added to our map
>> register was UNKNOWN in both the false and true branches and the only thing that
>> changed was the range then we'd incorrectly assume that the true branch was
>> valid, which it really wasnt. This tests this case and properly fails without
>> my fix in place and passes with it in place.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>
>
> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
>
> Thanks a lot for the test case! They are always useful to have ... which
> just reminds me: it seems we didn't add anything for f23cc643f9ba ("bpf:
> fix range arithmetic for bpf map access"). ;-)
I was hoping you wouldn't notice ;). I'll add one in the next couple of days.
Thanks,
Josef
Powered by blists - more mailing lists