netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v5 2/3] bpf: Add new cgroup attach type to enable sock modifications

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <04ddcbeb-aa5e-5329-4830-73434a7a8b75@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date:   Tue, 29 Nov 2016 14:01:44 -0700
From:   David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, daniel@...que.org, ast@...com,
        daniel@...earbox.net, maheshb@...gle.com, tgraf@...g.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 2/3] bpf: Add new cgroup attach type to enable
 sock modifications

On 11/29/16 1:01 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> Could you also expose sk_protcol and sk_type as read only fields?
> They have user space visible values already and will make this new
> BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK program type much more useful beyond vrf
> use case. Like we'll be able to write a tiny bpf program to block all
> raw sockets or all udp sockets for an application within a given cgroup.
> If someone would want to prevent udp traffic from an application,
> it can be done here within close to zero overhead for socket() syscall
> instead of checking every packet at networking layer.
> It can help vrf use case as well, so you can auto-bindtodevice
> only udp and tcp sockets instead of all... or do it for ipv4 or ipv6 only.
> Plenty of interesting opportunities with just two extra fields
> that cost nothing when not in use.

sure. for completeness I'll add sk_family too.