[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161129062938.GA84990@knc-06.sc.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 22:29:38 -0800
From: "Vishwanathapura, Niranjana" <niranjana.vishwanathapura@...el.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
Cc: "ira.weiny" <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 02/10] IB/hfi-vnic: Virtual Network Interface Controller
(VNIC) Bus driver
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 09:15:45AM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>> And will move the hfi_vnic module under
>> ‘drivers/infiniband/ulp/hfi_vnic’.
>
>I would prefer drivers/net/ethernet
>
>This is clearly not a ULP since it doesn't use verbs.
>
I understand it is not using verbs, but the control path (ib_device client) is
using verbs (IB MAD).
Our prefernce is to keep it somewhere under drivers/infiniband. Summarizing
reasons again here,
- VNIC control driver (ib_device client) is an IB MAD agent.
- It is purly a software construct, encapsualtes ethernet packets in Omni-path
packet and depends on hfi1 driver here for HW access.
Doug,
Any comments?
>Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists