[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b0f0299d-efa1-daae-347f-cc2031bdb7cb@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:15:00 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@...wei.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
caihe@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] vhost_net: don't continue to call the recvmsg when
meet errors
On 2016年11月30日 21:40, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 08:10:57PM +0800, Yunjian Wang wrote:
>> When we meet an error(err=-EBADFD) recvmsg,
> How do you get EBADFD? Won't vhost_net_rx_peek_head_len
> return 0 in this case, breaking the loop?
>
>> the error handling in vhost
>> handle_rx() will continue. This will cause a soft CPU lockup in vhost thread.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/vhost/net.c | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
>> index 5dc128a..edc470b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
>> @@ -717,6 +717,9 @@ static void handle_rx(struct vhost_net *net)
>> pr_debug("Discarded rx packet: "
>> " len %d, expected %zd\n", err, sock_len);
>> vhost_discard_vq_desc(vq, headcount);
>> + /* Don't continue to do, when meet errors. */
>> + if (err < 0)
>> + goto out;
> You might get e.g. EAGAIN and I think you need to retry
> in this case.
Yes.
>> continue;
>> }
>> /* Supply virtio_net_hdr if VHOST_NET_F_VIRTIO_NET_HDR */
>> --
>> 1.9.5.msysgit.1
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists