netdev - Re: [flamebait] xdp, well meaning but pointless

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161201165130.GE17239@breakpoint.cc>
Date:   Thu, 1 Dec 2016 17:51:30 +0100
From:   Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     tgraf@...g.ch, fw@...len.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [flamebait] xdp, well meaning but pointless

David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> Saying that ntuple filters can handle the early drop use case doesn't
> take into consideration the nature of the tables (hundreds of
> thousands of "evil" IP addresses),

Thats not what I said.

But Ok, message received. I rest my case.