netdev - RE: [PATCH v2] sh_eth: remove unchecked interrupts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <SG2PR06MB1165DFB4E735FC10696F08CA8A8F0@SG2PR06MB1165.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Thu, 1 Dec 2016 18:24:12 +0000
From:   Chris Brandt <Chris.Brandt@...esas.com>
To:     Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     Simon Horman <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] sh_eth: remove unchecked interrupts

On 12/1/2016, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>     One thing you've missed so far is mentioning R7S72100 (RZ/A1) in the
> subject. This driver supports many SoCs, you're only fixing one of them...

For the last sh_eth.c patch I submitted, I had:

"net: ethernet: renesas: sh_eth: add POST registers for rz"


Should I resend the patch as:

"[PATCH v3] sh_eth: remove unchecked interrupts for RZ/A1"


??

Chris