[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161201212139.uls24jaky3kyxsly@splinter>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 23:21:39 +0200
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
To: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, jiri@...nulli.us,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, idosch@...lanox.com, eladr@...lanox.com,
yotamg@...lanox.com, nogahf@...lanox.com, arkadis@...lanox.com,
ogerlitz@...lanox.com, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com,
dsa@...ulusnetworks.com, nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com,
andy@...yhouse.net, vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com,
andrew@...n.ch, f.fainelli@...il.com, alexander.h.duyck@...el.com,
kaber@...sh.net
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v3 11/12] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Request a dump
of FIB tables during init
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 10:09:19PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> On 01.12.2016 21:54, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 09:40:48PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> >> On 01.12.2016 21:04, David Miller wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hannes and Ido,
> >>>
> >>> It looks like we are very close to having this in mergable shape, can
> >>> you guys work out this final issue and figure out if it really is
> >>> a merge stopped or not?
> >>
> >> Sure, if the fib notification register could be done under protection of
> >> the sequence counter I don't see any more problems.
> >
> > Did you maybe miss my reply yesterday? Because I was trying to
> > understand what "ordering" you're referring to, but didn't receive a
> > reply from you.
>
> Oh, strange, I am pretty sure I replied to that. Let me resend it.
:)
I did get this reply, and then replied myself here:
https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=148053017425465&w=2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists