[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161201055953.GB42375@ast-mbp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 21:59:55 -0800
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, daniel@...que.org, ast@...com,
daniel@...earbox.net, maheshb@...gle.com, tgraf@...g.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 6/6] samples/bpf: add userspace example for
prohibiting sockets
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:16:50AM -0800, David Ahern wrote:
> Add examples preventing a process in a cgroup from opening a socket
> based family, protocol and type.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
...
> +++ b/samples/bpf/sock_flags_kern.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
> +#include <uapi/linux/bpf.h>
> +#include <linux/socket.h>
> +#include "bpf_helpers.h"
> +
> +SEC("cgroup/sock1")
> +int bpf_prog1(struct bpf_sock *sk)
> +{
> + char fmt[] = "socket: family %d type %d protocol %d\n";
> +
> + bpf_trace_printk(fmt, sizeof(fmt), sk->family, sk->type, sk->protocol);
> +
> + /* block PF_INET6, SOCK_RAW, IPPROTO_ICMPV6 sockets
> + * ie., make ping6 fail
> + */
> + if (sk->family == PF_INET6 && sk->type == 3 && sk->protocol == 58)
> + return 0;
why not to use SOCK_RAW and IPPROTO_ICMPV6 instead of constants?
Thanks for the test!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists