[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161202175241.GB31495@penelope.horms.nl>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 18:52:42 +0100
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC iproute2/net-next 0/3] tc: flower: Support matching
on ICMP
On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 06:10:20PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 10:59:42AM CET, simon.horman@...ronome.com wrote:
> >Add support for matching on ICMP type and code to flower. This is modeled
> >on existing support for matching on L4 ports.
> >
> >The second patch provided a minor cleanup which is in keeping with
> >they style used in the last patch.
> >
> >This is marked as an RFC to match the same designation given to the
> >corresponding kernel patches.
>
> Looks nice, I only have those 2 enum nitpicks.
Thanks, I'll fix those and repost.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists