[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <06dd8fc8-0c39-e79d-7e34-22bfab17d8a3@gmx.de>
Date:   Sat, 3 Dec 2016 14:53:07 +0100
From:   Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@....de>
To:     Pan Bian <bianpan201602@....com>,
        David Dillow <dave@...dillows.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Pan Bian <bianpan2016@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] net: ethernet: 3com: set error code on failures
Hi,
On 03.12.2016 14:24, Pan Bian wrote:
> From: Pan Bian <bianpan2016@....com>
> 
> In function typhoon_init_one(), returns the value of variable err on
> errors. However, on some error paths, variable err is not set to a
> negative errno. This patch assigns "-EIO" to err on those paths.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pan Bian <bianpan2016@....com>
>  
> @@ -2409,6 +2410,7 @@ enum state_values {
>  	INIT_COMMAND_WITH_RESPONSE(&xp_cmd, TYPHOON_CMD_READ_VERSIONS);
>  	if(typhoon_issue_command(tp, 1, &xp_cmd, 3, xp_resp) < 0) {
>  		err_msg = "Could not get Sleep Image version";
> +		err = -EIO;
>  		goto error_out_reset;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -2451,6 +2453,7 @@ enum state_values {
>  
>  	if(register_netdev(dev) < 0) {
>  		err_msg = "unable to register netdev";
> +		err = -EIO;
>  		goto error_out_reset;
>  	}
>  
> 
Why not return the error value provided by the called functions? Is there a reason
to map different errors to -EIO?
Regards,
Lino
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
