[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6DB0235052@AcuExch.aculab.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 17:02:20 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Phil Sutter' <phil@....cc>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [iproute PATCH v2 08/18] ss: Turn generic_proc_open() wrappers
into macros
From: Phil Sutter
> Sent: 02 December 2016 10:40
> Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>
> ---
> misc/ss.c | 89 ++++++++++++++-------------------------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/misc/ss.c b/misc/ss.c
> index ad38eb97b0055..71040a82ca6b1 100644
> --- a/misc/ss.c
> +++ b/misc/ss.c
> @@ -327,76 +327,25 @@ static FILE *generic_proc_open(const char *env, const char *name)
>
> return fopen(p, "r");
> }
> -
> -static FILE *net_tcp_open(void)
> -{
> - return generic_proc_open("PROC_NET_TCP", "net/tcp");
> -}
...
> +#define net_tcp_open() generic_proc_open("PROC_NET_TCP", "net/tcp")
...
Does that make any difference at all?
The compiler should inline the static functions.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists