[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20161203.203708.151248945683979245.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2016 20:37:08 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: edumazet@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, ycheng@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 8/8] tcp: tsq: move tsq_flags close to
sk_wmem_alloc
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2016 17:13:51 -0800
> On Sat, 2016-12-03 at 19:16 -0500, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>> Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2016 11:14:57 -0800
>>
>> > diff --git a/include/linux/tcp.h b/include/linux/tcp.h
>> > index d8be083ab0b0..fc5848dad7a4 100644
>> > --- a/include/linux/tcp.h
>> > +++ b/include/linux/tcp.h
>> > @@ -186,7 +186,6 @@ struct tcp_sock {
>> > u32 tsoffset; /* timestamp offset */
>> >
>> > struct list_head tsq_node; /* anchor in tsq_tasklet.head list */
>> > - unsigned long tsq_flags;
>> >
>> > /* Data for direct copy to user */
>> > struct {
>>
>> Hmmm, did you forget to "git add include/net/sock.h" before making
>> this commit?
>
> sk_tsq_flags was added in prior patch in the series ( 7/8 net:
> reorganize struct sock for better data locality)
>
> What is the problem with this part ?
Sorry, just noticed by visual inspection. I expected the
struct sock part to show up in the same patch as the one
that removed it from tcp_sock and adjusted the users.
I'll re-review this series, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists