[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9235D6609DB808459E95D78E17F2E43D409782F2@CHN-SV-EXMX02.mchp-main.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 15:57:24 +0000
From: <Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com>
To: <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <f.fainelli@...il.com>, <andrew@...n.ch>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next] phy: add phy fixup unregister functions
Thanks. Will do it.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Miller [mailto:davem@...emloft.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2016 10:57 AM
> To: Woojung Huh - C21699
> Cc: f.fainelli@...il.com; andrew@...n.ch; netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] phy: add phy fixup unregister functions
>
> From: <Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com>
> Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 15:44:39 +0000
>
> >> Please submit this along with whatever will be the first user(s) of these
> >> new interfaces.
> > Thanks David.
> >
> > This usage of this will be part of another patch
> (https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/700141/)
> > Would it be ok to include other patch in new version of patch?
>
> You must post them together as a series, yes.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists