netdev - RE: [PATCH net-next] phy: add phy fixup unregister functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 6 Dec 2016 15:57:24 +0000
From:   <Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com>
To:     <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     <f.fainelli@...il.com>, <andrew@...n.ch>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next] phy: add phy fixup unregister functions

Thanks. Will do it.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Miller [mailto:davem@...emloft.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2016 10:57 AM
> To: Woojung Huh - C21699
> Cc: f.fainelli@...il.com; andrew@...n.ch; netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] phy: add phy fixup unregister functions
> 
> From: <Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com>
> Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 15:44:39 +0000
> 
> >> Please submit this along with whatever will be the first user(s) of these
> >> new interfaces.
> > Thanks David.
> >
> > This usage of this will be part of another patch
> (https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/700141/)
> > Would it be ok to include other patch in new version of patch?
> 
> You must post them together as a series, yes.