[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20161206.113344.184595713713966514.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 11:33:44 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...oirfairelinux.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch,
eichest@...il.com, richardcochran@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next v3 0/4] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: rework reset
and PPU code
From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 17:30:24 -0500
> Old Marvell chips (like 88E6060) don't have a PHY Polling Unit (PPU).
>
> Next chips (like 88E6185) have a PPU, which has exclusive access to the
> PHY registers, thus must be disabled before access.
>
> Newer chips (like 88E6352) have an indirect mechanism to access the PHY
> registers whenever, thus loose control over the PPU (always enabled).
>
> Here's a summary:
>
> Model | PPU? | Has PPU ctrl? | PPU state readable? | PHY access
> ----- | ---- | -------------- | ------------------- | ----------
> 6060 | no | no | no | direct
> 6185 | yes | yes, PPUEn bit | yes, PPUState 2-bit | direct w/ PPU dis.
> 6352 | yes | no | yes, PPUState 1-bit | indirect
> 6390 | yes | no | yes, InitState bit | indirect
>
> Depending on the PPU control, a switch may have to restart the PPU when
> resetting the switch. Once the switch is reset, we must wait for the PPU
> state to be active polling again before accessing the registers.
>
> For that purpose, add new operations to the chips to enable/disable the
> PPU, and execute software reset. With these new ops in place, rework the
> switch reset code and finally get rid of the MV88E6XXX_FLAG_PPU* flags.
Series applied, thanks Vivien.
And thanks for the detailed, informative, header postings like this one.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists