netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next v2 4/4] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add PPU operations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD4aGmR0B9PPs=4sBMQKCn=yKB1sJC62+bJdPtPe7HeL6TZ4_w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 6 Dec 2016 13:27:16 +0100
From:   Stefan Eichenberger <eichest@...il.com>
To:     Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel@...oirfairelinux.com,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next v2 4/4] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add PPU operations

On 5 December 2016 at 23:18, Vivien Didelot
<vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com> wrote:
> Stefan Eichenberger <eichest@...il.com> writes:
>
>> Hi Vivien,
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 11:27:03AM -0500, Vivien Didelot wrote:
>>> @@ -3266,6 +3220,8 @@ static const struct mv88e6xxx_ops mv88e6097_ops = {
>>>      .g1_set_cpu_port = mv88e6095_g1_set_cpu_port,
>>>      .g1_set_egress_port = mv88e6095_g1_set_egress_port,
>>>      .mgmt_rsvd2cpu = mv88e6095_g2_mgmt_rsvd2cpu,
>>> +    .ppu_enable = mv88e6185_g1_ppu_enable,
>>> +    .ppu_disable = mv88e6185_g1_ppu_disable,
>>>      .reset = mv88e6185_g1_reset,
>>>  };
>>
>> The mv88e6097 should use the indirect access to the phys, bit 14 in g1
>> control is marked as reserved. They write in the datasheet that
>> disabling the PPU is still supported but indirect access via g2 should
>> be used because disabling the PPU  is no longer recommended.
>
> Ho ok thanks, I respin a v3 right away with this removed and with
> mv88e6352_g1_reset instead.

Perfect thank you, now it's fine.

Regards,
Stefan