[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161206134037.GA15946@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 14:40:37 +0100
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@...com>,
Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>,
Wingman Kwok <w-kwok2@...com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/13] net: ethernet: ti: cpts: rework
initialization/deinitialization
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 02:05:21PM -0600, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> @@ -372,34 +354,27 @@ void cpts_tx_timestamp(struct cpts *cpts, struct sk_buff *skb)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpts_tx_timestamp);
>
> -int cpts_register(struct device *dev, struct cpts *cpts,
> - u32 mult, u32 shift)
> +int cpts_register(struct cpts *cpts)
> {
> int err, i;
>
> - cpts->info = cpts_info;
> - spin_lock_init(&cpts->lock);
> -
> - cpts->cc.read = cpts_systim_read;
> - cpts->cc.mask = CLOCKSOURCE_MASK(32);
> - cpts->cc_mult = mult;
> - cpts->cc.mult = mult;
> - cpts->cc.shift = shift;
> -
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cpts->events);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cpts->pool);
> for (i = 0; i < CPTS_MAX_EVENTS; i++)
> list_add(&cpts->pool_data[i].list, &cpts->pool);
>
> - cpts_clk_init(dev, cpts);
> + clk_enable(cpts->refclk);
> +
> cpts_write32(cpts, CPTS_EN, control);
> cpts_write32(cpts, TS_PEND_EN, int_enable);
>
> + /* reinitialize cc.mult to original value as it can be modified
> + * by cpts_ptp_adjfreq().
> + */
> + cpts->cc.mult = cpts->cc_mult;
This still isn't quite right. First of all, you shouldn't clobber the
learned cc.mult value in cpts_register(). Presumably, if PTP had been
run on this port before, then the learned frequency is approximately
correct, and it should be left alone.
[ BTW, resetting the timecounter here makes no sense either. Why
reset the clock just because the interface goes down? ]
Secondly, you have made the initialization order of these fields hard
to follow. With the whole series applied:
probe()
cpts_create()
cpts_of_parse()
{
/* Set cc_mult but not cc.mult! */
set cc_mult
set cc.shift
}
cpts_calc_mult_shift()
{
/* Set them both. */
cpts->cc_mult = mult;
cpts->cc.mult = mult;
cpts->cc.shift = shift;
}
/* later on */
cpts_register()
cpts->cc.mult = cpts->cc_mult;
There is no need for such complexity. Simply set cc.mult in
cpts_create() _once_, immediately after the call to
cpts_calc_mult_shift().
You can remove the assignment from cpts_calc_mult_shift() and
cpts_register().
Thanks,
Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists