[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vf2ZncJcGguueh2fCsHaZVin8qGSk+hDUt+uRg8ffgZbQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 22:15:55 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Giuseppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@...com>
Cc: Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
Rayagond Kokatanur <rayagond@...avyalabs.com>,
Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>, mued dib <kreptor@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>, jiri@...lanox.com,
saeedm@...lanox.com, idosch@...lanox.com,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
CARLOS.PALMINHA@...opsys.com, andreas.irestal@...s.com,
lars.persson@...s.com, Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Synopsys Ethernet QoS Driver
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO
<peppe.cavallaro@...com> wrote:
First of all, +1 to (re-)use stmmac.
> The stmmac drivers run since many years on several platforms
> (sh4, stm32, arm, x86, mips ...) and it supports an huge of amount of
> configurations starting from 3.1x to 3.7x databooks.
As Intel employee who did some clean ups to that, acknowledge above.
> Concerning the stmicro/stmmac naming, these come from a really old
> story and have no issue to adopt new folder/file names.
I don't think it would be best idea for platform driver (though we can
keep driver's name in the structure in async with file name).
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists