[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1481221491.6120.11.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 19:24:51 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 4/4] udp: add batching to udp_rmem_release()
On Thu, 2016-12-08 at 09:38 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> If udp_recvmsg() constantly releases sk_rmem_alloc
> for every read packet, it gives opportunity for
> producers to immediately grab spinlocks and desperatly
> try adding another packet, causing false sharing.
>
> We can add a simple heuristic to give the signal
> by batches of ~25 % of the queue capacity.
>
> This patch considerably increases performance under
> flood by about 50 %, since the thread draining the queue
> is no longer slowed by false sharing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> ---
> include/linux/udp.h | 3 +++
> net/ipv4/udp.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/udp.h b/include/linux/udp.h
> index d1fd8cd39478..c0f530809d1f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/udp.h
> +++ b/include/linux/udp.h
> @@ -79,6 +79,9 @@ struct udp_sock {
> int (*gro_complete)(struct sock *sk,
> struct sk_buff *skb,
> int nhoff);
> +
> + /* This field is dirtied by udp_recvmsg() */
> + int forward_deficit;
> };
>
> static inline struct udp_sock *udp_sk(const struct sock *sk)
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> index 880cd3d84abf..f0096d088104 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> @@ -1177,8 +1177,19 @@ int udp_sendpage(struct sock *sk, struct page *page, int offset,
> /* fully reclaim rmem/fwd memory allocated for skb */
> static void udp_rmem_release(struct sock *sk, int size, int partial)
> {
> + struct udp_sock *up = udp_sk(sk);
> int amt;
>
> + if (likely(partial)) {
> + up->forward_deficit += size;
> + size = up->forward_deficit;
> + if (size < (sk->sk_rcvbuf >> 2))
> + return;
> + } else {
> + size += up->forward_deficit;
> + }
> + up->forward_deficit = 0;
> +
> atomic_sub(size, &sk->sk_rmem_alloc);
> sk->sk_forward_alloc += size;
> amt = (sk->sk_forward_alloc - partial) & ~(SK_MEM_QUANTUM - 1);
Nice one! This sounds like a relevant improvement!
I'm wondering if it may cause regressions with small value of
sk_rcvbuf ?!? e.g. with:
netperf -t UDP_STREAM -H 127.0.0.1 -- -s 1280 -S 1280 -m 1024 -M 1024
I'm sorry, I fear I will not unable to do any test before next week.
Cheers,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists