[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20161208.132602.1437771867201682270.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 13:26:02 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] udp: under rx pressure, try to condense skbs
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 09:19:33 -0800
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>
> Under UDP flood, many softirq producers try to add packets to
> UDP receive queue, and one user thread is burning one cpu trying
> to dequeue packets as fast as possible.
>
> Two parts of the per packet cost are :
> - copying payload from kernel space to user space,
> - freeing memory pieces associated with skb.
>
> If socket is under pressure, softirq handler(s) can try to pull in
> skb->head the payload of the packet if it fits.
>
> Meaning the softirq handler(s) can free/reuse the page fragment
> immediately, instead of letting udp_recvmsg() do this hundreds of usec
> later, possibly from another node.
>
>
> Additional gains :
> - We reduce skb->truesize and thus can store more packets per SO_RCVBUF
> - We avoid cache line misses at copyout() time and consume_skb() time,
> and avoid one put_page() with potential alien freeing on NUMA hosts.
>
> This comes at the cost of a copy, bounded to available tail room, which
> is usually small. (We might have to fix GRO_MAX_HEAD which looks bigger
> than necessary)
>
> This patch gave me about 5 % increase in throughput in my tests.
>
> skb_condense() helper could probably used in other contexts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
This is isolated to UDP, and would be easy to revert if it causes
problems. So applied, thanks Eric.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists