netdev - Re: [PATCH net 1/1] driver: ipvlan: Unlink the upper dev when ipvlan_link

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+6hz4p2pUJGQNM_CmNpSFPMrmA=9QBH-jx_1T7VGQv4Lh32GQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 8 Dec 2016 09:44:44 +0800
From:   Gao Feng <fgao@...ai8.com>
To:     Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) 
        <maheshb@...gle.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        linux-netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/1] driver: ipvlan: Unlink the upper dev when
 ipvlan_link_new failed

On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार)
<maheshb@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 5:21 PM,  <fgao@...ai8.com> wrote:
>> From: Gao Feng <fgao@...ai8.com>
>>
>> When netdev_upper_dev_unlink failed in ipvlan_link_new, need to
>> unlink the ipvlan dev with upper dev.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gao Feng <fgao@...ai8.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_main.c | 4 +++-
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_main.c b/drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_main.c
>> index 0fef178..189adbc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_main.c
>> @@ -546,13 +546,15 @@ static int ipvlan_link_new(struct net *src_net, struct net_device *dev,
>>         }
>>         err = ipvlan_set_port_mode(port, mode);
>>         if (err) {
>> -               goto unregister_netdev;
>> +               goto dev_unlink;
>>         }
>>
>>         list_add_tail_rcu(&ipvlan->pnode, &port->ipvlans);
>>         netif_stacked_transfer_operstate(phy_dev, dev);
>>         return 0;
>>
>> +dev_unlink:
> probably 'unlink_netdev' label inline with other labels used. thanks

OK, it is better name.
I will follow it and send v2 update.

Regards
Feng

>> +       netdev_upper_dev_unlink(phy_dev, dev);
>>  unregister_netdev:
>>         unregister_netdevice(dev);
>>  destroy_ipvlan_port:
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
>>