lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1481231024.1911284.813071977.72AF4DEE@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Date:   Thu, 08 Dec 2016 22:03:44 +0100
From:   Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To:     Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>
Subject: Re: Soft lockup in inet_put_port on 4.6

Hello Tom,

On Wed, Dec 7, 2016, at 00:06, Tom Herbert wrote:
> We are seeing a fair number of machines getting into softlockup in 4.6
> kernel. As near as I can tell this is happening on the spinlock in
> bind hash bucket. When inet_csk_get_port exits and does spinunlock_bh
> the TCP timer runs and we hit lockup in inet_put_port (presumably on
> same lock). It seems like the locked isn't properly be unlocked
> somewhere but I don't readily see it.
> 
> Any ideas?

Likewise we received reports that pretty much look the same on our
heavily patched kernel. Did you have a chance to investigate or
reproduce the problem?

I am wondering if you would be able to take a complete thread stack dump
if you can reproduce this to check if one of the user space processes is
looping inside finding a free port?

Thanks,
Hannes

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ