[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DM3PR07MB21386696FCE7727BD9B3B48C81840@DM3PR07MB2138.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 22:42:11 +0000
From: "Vatsavayi, Raghu" <Raghu.Vatsavayi@...ium.com>
To: Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Chickles, Derek" <Derek.Chickles@...ium.com>,
"Burla, Satananda" <Satananda.Burla@...ium.com>,
"Manlunas, Felix" <Felix.Manlunas@...ium.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 2/5] liquidio VF vxlan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Or Gerlitz [mailto:gerlitz.or@...il.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2016 1:08 PM
> To: Vatsavayi, Raghu
> Cc: David Miller; Linux Netdev List; Vatsavayi, Raghu; Chickles, Derek; Burla,
> Satananda; Manlunas, Felix
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/5] liquidio VF vxlan
>
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 11:00 PM, Raghu Vatsavayi
> <rvatsavayi@...iumnetworks.com> wrote:
>
> > Adds VF vxlan offload support.
>
> What's the use case for that? a VM running a VTEP, isn't that part needs to
> run @ the host?
>
> Or.
Our HW can support offloads for VF which is required if we load it on Hypervisor.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists