netdev - Re: Synopsys Ethernet QoS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <93b73b79-36aa-56b8-f975-b890b7a48bd1@synopsys.com>
Date:   Fri, 9 Dec 2016 15:36:38 +0000
From:   Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>
CC:     <peppe.cavallaro@...com>, <lars.persson@...s.com>,
        <rabin.vincent@...s.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>, <CARLOS.PALMINHA@...opsys.com>
Subject: Re: Synopsys Ethernet QoS

Hi David,

Of course, I started a general discussion about the subject and those were the
conclusions, but I would like to know if you as the subsystem maintainer also
support the approach or have any suggestion.

Thanks,
Joao

Às 3:33 PM de 12/9/2016, David Miller escreveu:
> From: Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>
> Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 11:29:02 +0000
> 
>> Dear David Miller,
>  ...
>> I would like to know if you support this plan.
> 
> This is not how this works.
> 
> You need to discuss and work out a plan with the other people
> with a direct interest in the existing drivers and maintainence.
> 
> Not me.
>