[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD5ja62JQzjkM2VD7N+D0Vz3tOM7y9dZ43Fd_+ARz_OzLTOF-w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 11:50:50 +0100
From: Niklas Cassel <nks.gnu@...il.com>
To: Jie Deng <Jie.Deng1@...opsys.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, alexandre.torgue@...com,
peppe.cavallaro@...com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
CARLOS.PALMINHA@...opsys.com, Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com
Subject: Re: stmmac driver...
Hello Jie Deng
In your cover letter you wrote
dwc-eth-xxx.x
The DWC ethernet core layer (DWC ECL). This layer contains codes
can be shared by different DWC series ethernet cores
Does this mean that code in dwc-eth-xxx.x is common to all
the different Synopsys IPs, GMAC, XGMAC and XLGMAC ?
Regards,
Niklas
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Jie Deng <Jie.Deng1@...opsys.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 2016/12/8 23:25, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
>> Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 14:55:04 +0100
>>
>>> Maybe I forget some series. Do you have others in mind ?
>> Please see the thread titled:
>>
>> "net: ethernet: Initial driver for Synopsys DWC XLGMAC"
>>
>> which seems to be discussing consolidation of various drivers
>> for the same IP core, of which stmmac is one.
>>
>> I personally am against any change of the driver name and
>> things like this, and wish the people doing that work would
>> simply contribute to making whatever changes they need directly
>> to the stmmac driver.
>>
>> You really need to voice your opinion when major changes are being
>> proposed for the driver you maintain.
>>
> Hi David and Alex,
>
> XLGMAC is not a version of GMAC. Synopsys has several IPs and each IP has
> several versions.
>
> GMAC(QoS): 3.5, 3.7, 4.0, 4.10, 4.20...
> XGMAC: 1.00, 1.10, 1.20, 2.00, 2.10, 2.11...
> XLGMAC (Synopsys DesignWare Core Enterprise Ethernet): this is a new IP.
>
> Regards,
> Jie
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists