netdev - Re: [iproute2 net-next 1/8] lib bpf: Add support for BPF_PROG_ATTACH and BPF_PROG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <93dbc1b0-a76e-4375-0a52-6aa5b4a78c7e@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date:   Sat, 10 Dec 2016 15:15:33 -0700
From:   David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        stephen@...workplumber.org
Subject: Re: [iproute2 net-next 1/8] lib bpf: Add support for BPF_PROG_ATTACH
 and BPF_PROG_DETACH

On 12/10/16 2:21 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>>
>> Please name it bpf_prog_create() then, it would be consistent to
>> bpf_map_create() and shorter as well.
> 
> Sorry, lack of coffee, scratch that.
> 
> Can't the current bpf_prog_attach() stay as is, and you name the above new
> functions bpf_prog_attach_fd() and bpf_prog_detach_fd()? I think that would
> be better.

ok. no concerns about consistency with libbpf in the kernel repo?

Seems like making iproute2 and the kernel version the same will allow samples and code to move between them much easier.