[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f5078470-0fc0-cfcd-36df-3ebb380b547a@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 15:59:46 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "Pablo Neira Ayuso (supporter:NETFILTER ({IP ,IP6,ARP,EB,NF}TABLES))"
<pablo@...filter.org>,
"Patrick McHardy (supporter:NETFILTER ({IP,IP6,ARP ,EB,NF}TABLES))"
<kaber@...sh.net>,
"Jozsef Kadlecsik (supporter:NETFILTER ({IP,IP6,ARP,EB,NF}TABLES))"
<kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>,
"Stephen Hemminger (maintainer:ETHERNET BRIDGE)"
<stephen@...workplumber.org>,
"open list:NETFILTER ({IP,IP6,ARP,EB ,NF}TABLES)"
<netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ETHERNET BRIDGE" <bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 13/27] bridge: use __vlan_hwaccel helpers
Hello!
On 12/13/2016 3:12 AM, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> This removes assumption than vlan_tci != 0 when tag is present.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
> ---
> net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c | 14 ++++++++------
> net/bridge/br_private.h | 2 +-
> net/bridge/br_vlan.c | 6 +++---
> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c b/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
> index b12501a..2cc0747 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
[...]
> @@ -749,8 +747,12 @@ static int br_nf_dev_queue_xmit(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff
>
> data = this_cpu_ptr(&brnf_frag_data_storage);
>
> - data->vlan_tci = skb->vlan_tci;
> - data->vlan_proto = skb->vlan_proto;
> + if (skb_vlan_tag_present(skb)) {
> + data->vlan_tci = skb->vlan_tci;
> + data->vlan_proto = skb->vlan_proto;
> + } else
> + data->vlan_proto = 0;
CodingStyle: should use {} in all branches of *if* if at least one branch
has {}.
[...]
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_vlan.c b/net/bridge/br_vlan.c
> index b6de4f4..ef94664 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_vlan.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_vlan.c
> @@ -444,8 +444,8 @@ static bool __allowed_ingress(const struct net_bridge *br,
> __vlan_hwaccel_put_tag(skb, br->vlan_proto, pvid);
> else
> /* Priority-tagged Frame.
> - * At this point, We know that skb->vlan_tci had
> - * VLAN_TAG_PRESENT bit and its VID field was 0x000.
> + * At this point, We know that skb->vlan_tci VID
s/We/we/.
> + * field was 0x000.
Simply 0, maybe?
[...]
MBR, Sergei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists