netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/3] selftests: do not require bash to run bpf tests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5851270F.4090709@iogearbox.net>
Date:   Wed, 14 Dec 2016 12:03:43 +0100
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     Rolf Eike Beer <eb@...ix.com>, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
CC:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] selftests: do not require bash to run bpf tests

On 12/14/2016 11:58 AM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
>  From b9d6c1b7427d708ef2d4d57aac17b700b3694d71 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@...tec.de>
> Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 09:58:12 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH 2/3] selftests: do not require bash to run bpf tests
>
> Nothing in this minimal script seems to require bash. We often run these tests
> on embedded devices where the only shell available is the busybox ash.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rolf Eike Beer <eb@...ix.com>

Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>