[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <3d4f0205d5b5c64d372dffb37602f48e4a173612.1481814352.git.lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 23:05:52 +0800
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
To: network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Subject: [PATCH net] sctp: sctp_transport_lookup_process should rcu_read_unlock when transport is null
Prior to this patch, sctp_transport_lookup_process didn't rcu_read_unlock
when it failed to find a transport by sctp_addrs_lookup_transport.
This patch is to fix it by moving up rcu_read_unlock right before checking
transport and also to remove the out path.
Fixes: 1cceda784980 ("sctp: fix the issue sctp_diag uses lock_sock in rcu_read_lock")
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
---
net/sctp/socket.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
index d5f4b4a..318c678 100644
--- a/net/sctp/socket.c
+++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
@@ -4472,18 +4472,17 @@ int sctp_transport_lookup_process(int (*cb)(struct sctp_transport *, void *),
const union sctp_addr *paddr, void *p)
{
struct sctp_transport *transport;
- int err = -ENOENT;
+ int err;
rcu_read_lock();
transport = sctp_addrs_lookup_transport(net, laddr, paddr);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
if (!transport)
- goto out;
+ return -ENOENT;
- rcu_read_unlock();
err = cb(transport, p);
sctp_transport_put(transport);
-out:
return err;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sctp_transport_lookup_process);
--
2.1.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists