netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] net:dsa:mv88e6xxx: use hashtable to store multicast entries

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87eg19hzw1.fsf@weeman.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
Date:   Thu, 15 Dec 2016 12:21:18 -0500
From:   Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
To:     Volodymyr Bendiuga <volodymyr.bendiuga@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     Volodymyr Bendiuga <valdr.linuxnext@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Volodymyr Bendiuga <volodymyr.bendiuga@...termo.se>,
        John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] net:dsa:mv88e6xxx: use hashtable to store multicast entries

Hi Volodymyr,

Volodymyr Bendiuga <volodymyr.bendiuga@...il.com> writes:

> Hi Andrew,
>
> I have tested the approach you wrote in previous mails, the one
> with setting next.mac to address we are looking for -1. It seems
> to be as slow as the original implementation, unfortunately.

Hum, that is what I was expecting... The ATU GetNext operation
(alongside an ether_addr_equal() call) should be quite fast.

> We use 6097 and 6352 chips, and both of them can not do any port
> filtering in hardware for fdb dump operation. Seems like they would
> benefit from cache. But I am not sure about other switches.
>
> Does anyone know about such feature in other switches?

Marvell switches cannot filter ATU entries for a specific port, they
contain a port vector.

I guess Florian might answer for Broadcom switches, and John might
answer for Qualcomm switches.

In all cases *if caching is really needed*, I think it won't hurt to do
it in DSA core even if a switch support FDB dump operations on a
per-port basis, as Andrew mentioned.

Thanks,

        Vivien