netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] net:dsa:mv88e6xxx: use hashtable to store multicast entries

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87bmwdcc96.fsf@weeman.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
Date:   Thu, 15 Dec 2016 12:50:45 -0500
From:   Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Volodymyr Bendiuga <volodymyr.bendiuga@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     Volodymyr Bendiuga <valdr.linuxnext@...il.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Volodymyr Bendiuga <volodymyr.bendiuga@...termo.se>,
        John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] net:dsa:mv88e6xxx: use hashtable to store multicast entries

Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> writes:

>> In all cases *if caching is really needed*, I think it won't hurt to do
>> it in DSA core even if a switch support FDB dump operations on a
>> per-port basis, as Andrew mentioned.
>
> Agreed, and there does not appear to be any need to new dsa_switch_ops
> operations to be introduced?

Nope.