[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201612161140.27241@pali>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 11:40:27 +0100
From: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
To: Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>,
Tom Gundersen <teg@...m.no>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@...to.com>,
Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>,
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
"linux-wireless" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: wl1251 & mac address & calibration data
On Friday 16 December 2016 08:25:44 Daniel Wagner wrote:
> On 12/16/2016 03:03 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > For the new API a solution for "fallback mechanisms" should be
> > clean though and I am looking to stay as far as possible from the
> > existing mess. A solution to help both the old API and new API is
> > possible for the "fallback mechanism" though -- but for that I can
> > only refer you at this point to some of Daniel Wagner and Tom
> > Gunderson's firmwared deamon prospect. It should help pave the way
> > for a clean solution and help address other stupid issues.
>
> The firmwared project is hosted here
>
> https://github.com/teg/firmwared
>
> As Luis pointed out, firmwared relies on
> FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER_FALLBACK, which is not enabled by default.
I know. But it does not mean that I cannot enable this option at kernel
compile time.
Bigger problem is that currently request_firmware() first try to load
firmware directly from VFS and after that (if fails) fallback to user
helper.
So I would need to extend kernel firmware code with new function (or
flag) to not use VFS and try only user mode helper.
> I
> don't see any reason why firmwared should not also support loading
> calibration data. If we find a sound way to do this.
It can, but why should I use another daemon for firmware loading as
non-systemd version of udev (and eudev fork) support firmware loading?
I think I stay with udev/eudev.
> As you can see from the commit history it is a pretty young project
> and more ore less reanimation of the old udev firmware loader
> feature. We are getting int into shape, adding integration tests
> etc.
>
> The main motivation for this project is the get movement back in
> stuck discussion on the firmware loader API. Luis was very busy
> writing up all the details on the current situation and purely from
> the amount of documentation need to describe the API you can tell
> something is awry.
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel
--
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@...il.com
Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists