lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 17 Dec 2016 11:13:33 -0500 (EST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     tom@...bertland.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com, jbacik@...com,
        eric.dumazet@...il.com, raigatgoog@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] inet: Fixes for inet_csk_get_port and
 soreusport

From: Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 16:54:14 -0800

> This patch set fixes a couple of issues I noticed while debugging our
> softlockup issue in inet_csk_get_port.
> 
> - Don't allow jump into port scan in inet_csk_get_port if function
>   was called with non-zero port number (looking up explicit port
>   number).
> - When inet_csk_get_port is called with zero port number (ie. perform
>   scan) an reuseport is set on the socket, don't match sockets that
>   also have reuseport set. The intent from the user should be
>   to get a new port number and then explictly bind other
>   sockets to that number using soreuseport.
> 
> Tested:
> 
> Ran first patch on production workload with no ill effect.
> 
> For second patch, ran a little listener application and first
> demonstrated that unbound sockets with soreuseport can indeed
> be bound to unrelated soreuseport sockets.

Series applied, thanks Tom.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ