netdev - Re: [PATCH net] ipvlan: fix crash

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAF2d9jjWPEJn55y8hPUkihFyv+fHX_2i0jRbnrfgybZ1pHOByg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 18 Dec 2016 10:10:38 -0800
From:   Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) 
        <maheshb@...gle.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     mahesh@...dewar.net, linux-netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipvlan: fix crash

On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 8:54 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Mahesh Bandewar <mahesh@...dewar.net>
> Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2016 18:16:19 -0800
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c b/drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c
>> index b4e990743e1d..4294fc1f5564 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c
>> @@ -660,6 +660,9 @@ rx_handler_result_t ipvlan_handle_frame(struct sk_buff **pskb)
>>       if (!port)
>>               return RX_HANDLER_PASS;
>>
>> +     if (unlikely(!pskb_may_pull(skb, sizeof(struct ethhdr))))
>> +             goto out;
>> +
>>       switch (port->mode) {
>
> ipvlan only allows non-loopback ethernet devices to register
> this RX handler.
>
> Such situations being tested here should therefore be completely
> impossible.
>
Yes, correct. This happens when the master device is set in loopback mode.

> Every such device must send the SKB through eth_type_trans(), which
> unconditionally accesses the ethernet header, therefore it must
> be pulled into the linear SKB area already, long before this RX
> handler is invoked.
>
> If this really can legitimately happen, you must explain how so.
>
OK, will update the commit log.

> Just showing the crash that later happens in some (completely
> unrelated BTW) ipvlan multicast workqueue handling function, is
> really an insufficient commit log message for a bug like this.