[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161219145227.GC10048@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 15:52:27 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Romain Perier <romain.perier@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Add support for ethernet switch
88E6341/88E6141
Hi Romain
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
> index 76d944e..72ba24b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
> @@ -4086,6 +4086,20 @@ static const struct mv88e6xxx_info mv88e6xxx_table[] = {
> .ops = &mv88e6321_ops,
> },
>
> + [MV88E6341] = {
> + .prod_num = PORT_SWITCH_ID_PROD_NUM_6341,
> + .family = MV88E6XXX_FAMILY_6352,
> + .name = "Marvell 88E6341",
> + .num_databases = 4096,
> + .num_ports = 6,
> + .port_base_addr = 0x10,
> + .global1_addr = 0x1b,
> + .age_time_coeff = 15000,
> + .tag_protocol = DSA_TAG_PROTO_EDSA,
> + .flags = MV88E6XXX_FLAGS_FAMILY_6352,
> + .ops = &mv88e6352_ops,
Even if it i 100% compatible with the 6532, you should still add an
ops structure for it. All chips have their own, even when the are
exactly the same as other in the family.
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/mv88e6xxx.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/mv88e6xxx.h
> @@ -86,6 +86,7 @@
> #define PORT_SWITCH_ID_PROD_NUM_6097 0x099
> #define PORT_SWITCH_ID_PROD_NUM_6131 0x106
> #define PORT_SWITCH_ID_PROD_NUM_6320 0x115
> +#define PORT_SWITCH_ID_PROD_NUM_6341 0x340
> #define PORT_SWITCH_ID_PROD_NUM_6123 0x121
> #define PORT_SWITCH_ID_PROD_NUM_6161 0x161
Ah, err..
These should be in numerical order of the macro.
PORT_SWITCH_ID_PROD_NUM_6320 is however in the wrong place. Please
put the 6341 after the 6321.
Thanks
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists