lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <020e1c77-504e-3cfc-e526-ce1645fd6b32@synopsys.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Dec 2016 14:52:13 +0000
From:   Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>
To:     Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@...s.com>,
        Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>, <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
        <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     <hock.leong.kweh@...el.com>, <pavel@....cz>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] stmmac: enable rx queues


Hi Niklas,

Às 2:43 PM de 12/20/2016, Niklas Cassel escreveu:
> 
> 
> On 12/20/2016 01:55 PM, Joao Pinto wrote:
>> When the hardware is synthesized with multiple queues, all queues are
>> disabled for default. This patch adds the rx queues configuration.
>> This patch was successfully tested in a Synopsys QoS Reference design.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Joao Pinto <jpinto@...opsys.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h      |  2 ++
>>  drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4.h      |  4 ++++
>>  drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_core.c | 11 +++++++++++
>>  drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>  4 files changed, 38 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h
>> index b13a144..61bab50 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h
>> @@ -454,6 +454,8 @@ struct stmmac_ops {
>>  	void (*core_init)(struct mac_device_info *hw, int mtu);
>>  	/* Enable and verify that the IPC module is supported */
>>  	int (*rx_ipc)(struct mac_device_info *hw);
>> +	/* Enable RX Queues */
>> +	void (*rx_queue_enable)(struct mac_device_info *hw, u32 queue);
>>  	/* Dump MAC registers */
>>  	void (*dump_regs)(struct mac_device_info *hw);
>>  	/* Handle extra events on specific interrupts hw dependent */
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4.h
>> index 3e8d4fe..fd013bd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4.h
>> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>>  #define GMAC_HASH_TAB_32_63		0x00000014
>>  #define GMAC_RX_FLOW_CTRL		0x00000090
>>  #define GMAC_QX_TX_FLOW_CTRL(x)		(0x70 + x * 4)
>> +#define GMAC_RXQ_CTRL0			0x000000a0
>>  #define GMAC_INT_STATUS			0x000000b0
>>  #define GMAC_INT_EN			0x000000b4
>>  #define GMAC_PCS_BASE			0x000000e0
>> @@ -44,6 +45,9 @@
>>  
>>  #define GMAC_MAX_PERFECT_ADDRESSES	128
>>  
>> +/* MAC RX Queue Enable*/
>> +#define GMAC_RX_QUEUE_ENABLE(queue)	BIT(queue * 2)
> 
> Always have parentheses around a variable in a
> macro, otherwise strange things could happen.
> Imagine if you send 5 - 4 as argument,
> it will then expand to 5 - 4 * 2 = -3,
> instead of (5 - 4) * 2 = 2

Right. I am going to do that.

> 
>> +
>>  /* MAC Flow Control RX */
>>  #define GMAC_RX_FLOW_CTRL_RFE		BIT(0)
>>  
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_core.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_core.c
>> index eaed7cb..7ec1887 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_core.c
>> @@ -59,6 +59,16 @@ static void dwmac4_core_init(struct mac_device_info *hw, int mtu)
>>  	writel(value, ioaddr + GMAC_INT_EN);
>>  }
>>  
>> +static void dwmac4_rx_queue_enable(struct mac_device_info *hw, u32 queue)
>> +{
>> +	void __iomem *ioaddr = hw->pcsr;
>> +	u32 value = readl(ioaddr + GMAC_RXQ_CTRL0);
>> +
>> +	value |= GMAC_RX_QUEUE_ENABLE(queue);
>> +
>> +	writel(value, ioaddr + GMAC_RXQ_CTRL0);
>> +}
>> +
>>  static void dwmac4_dump_regs(struct mac_device_info *hw)
>>  {
>>  	void __iomem *ioaddr = hw->pcsr;
>> @@ -392,6 +402,7 @@ static void dwmac4_debug(void __iomem *ioaddr, struct stmmac_extra_stats *x)
>>  static const struct stmmac_ops dwmac4_ops = {
>>  	.core_init = dwmac4_core_init,
>>  	.rx_ipc = dwmac4_rx_ipc_enable,
>> +	.rx_queue_enable = dwmac4_rx_queue_enable,
>>  	.dump_regs = dwmac4_dump_regs,
>>  	.host_irq_status = dwmac4_irq_status,
>>  	.flow_ctrl = dwmac4_flow_ctrl,
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
>> index 3e40578..e30034d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
>> @@ -1271,6 +1271,24 @@ static void free_dma_desc_resources(struct stmmac_priv *priv)
>>  }
>>  
>>  /**
>> + *  stmmac_mac_enable_rx_queues - Enable MAC rx queues
>> + *  @priv: driver private structure
>> + *  Description: It is used for enabling the rx queues in the MAC
>> + */
>> +static void stmmac_mac_enable_rx_queues(struct stmmac_priv *priv)
>> +{
>> +	int rx_count = priv->dma_cap.number_rx_channel;
> 
> priv->dma_cap.number_rx_channel
> actually contains the value from register
> MAC_HW_Feature2, field RXCHCNT,
> which is the number of DMA rx channels.
> 
> This is not the same as the number of MTL
> receive queues, field RXQCNT in MAC_HW_Feature2.
> 
> I guess they will often have the same value,
> but since there actually are two different fields
> for them, I suppose that is not always the case.

Yes, you typically have a match between channels and queues.
But I can use RXQCNT of course, I agree.

> 
> 
> 
> Reading the comments in dwmac4_dma.*
> 
> #define DMA_CHANNEL_NB_MAX              1
> 
> "Only Channel 0 is actually configured and used"
> 
> "Following code only done for channel 0, other channels not yet supported"
> 
> Is there any point in actually enabling more than RX queue 0 if the
> driver does not yet support more than one channel.
> Can RXCHCNT ever be different from RXQCNT?
> If so, when? Maybe when using an external DMA IP?

Yes, currently stmmac only supports 1 Channel. Bt it needs this feature if the
hardware is multi-channel. The hardware I have is multi-channel and so you have
to enable RX queue for it to work and that's why I made this fix.
In the future I will develope multi channel support for stmmac and this RX queue
enable will be already made.

> 
> 
>> +	int queue = 0;
>> +
>> +	/* If GMAC does not have multiqueues, then this is not necessary*/
>> +	if (rx_count == 1)
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	for (queue = 0; queue < rx_count; queue++)
>> +		priv->hw->mac->rx_queue_enable(priv->hw, queue);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>>   *  stmmac_dma_operation_mode - HW DMA operation mode
>>   *  @priv: driver private structure
>>   *  Description: it is used for configuring the DMA operation mode register in
>> @@ -1691,6 +1709,9 @@ static int stmmac_hw_setup(struct net_device *dev, bool init_ptp)
>>  	/* Initialize the MAC Core */
>>  	priv->hw->mac->core_init(priv->hw, dev->mtu);
>>  
>> +	/* Initialize MAC RX Queues */
>> +	stmmac_mac_enable_rx_queues(priv);
>> +
>>  	ret = priv->hw->mac->rx_ipc(priv->hw);
>>  	if (!ret) {
>>  		netdev_warn(priv->dev, "RX IPC Checksum Offload disabled\n");
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ