[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87shpiu8j8.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 13:47:23 +0200
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To: Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>
Cc: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>,
Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Tom Gundersen <teg@...m.no>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Rafał Miłecki
<zajec5@...il.com>, Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@...to.com>,
Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>,
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: wl1251 & mac address & calibration data
Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com> writes:
> On 18-12-2016 13:09, Pali Rohár wrote:
>
>> File wl1251-nvs.bin is provided by linux-firmware package and contains
>> default data which should be overriden by model specific calibrated
>> data.
>
> Ah. Someone thought it was a good idea to provide the "one ring to rule
> them all". Nice.
Yes, that was a bad idea. wl1251-nvs.bin in linux-firmware.git should be
renamed to wl1251-nvs.bin.example, or something like that, as it should
be only installed to a real system only if there's no real calibration
data available (only for developers to use, not real users).
>> But overwriting that one file is not possible as it next update of
>> linux-firmware package will overwrite it back. It break any normal usage
>> of package management.
>>
>> Also it is ridiculously broken by design if some "boot" files needs to
>> be overwritten to initialize hardware properly. To not break booting you
>> need to overwrite that file before first boot. But without booting
>> device you cannot read calibration data. So some hack with autoreboot
>> after boot is needed.
Providing the calibration data via Device Tree is the proper way to
solve this. Yes yes, I know N900 doesn't support it but that's a
deficiency in N900, not Linux.
>> And how to detect that we have real overwritten calibration data and
>> not default one from linux-firmware? Any heuristic or checks will be
>> broken here. And no, nothing like you need to reboot your device now
>> (and similar concept) from windows world is not accepted.
>
> Well. After reading and creating calibration data you could just rebind
> the driver to the device to have it probed again.
Or load wl1251 as a module and make sure calibration data is installed
before the module is loaded. LEDE does that with ath10k:
https://git.lede-project.org/?p=source.git;a=blob;f=target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/etc/hotplug.d/firmware/11-ath10k-caldata;h=97875bd79a579a0010da3f60324b6ec966fe9c6a;hb=HEAD
> But yeah, the default one from linux-firmware should never have been
> there in the first place.
Agreed.
--
Kalle Valo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists