[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJpBn1wKkJ83GLznzQ+DCs7JZb-FkQ-zYu3d6i4p1RmfKy0mig@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 12:30:39 +0000
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, kafai@...com,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, mst@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] virtio_net: reject XDP programs using header adjustment
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 5:50 PM, John Fastabend
<john.fastabend@...il.com> wrote:
> On 16-12-19 07:05 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> commit 17bedab27231 ("bpf: xdp: Allow head adjustment in XDP prog")
>> added a new XDP helper to prepend and remove data from a frame.
>> Make virtio_net reject programs making use of this helper until
>> proper support is added.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 5 +++++
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> index 08327e005ccc..db761f37783e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> @@ -1677,6 +1677,11 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_set(struct net_device *dev, struct bpf_prog *prog)
>> u16 xdp_qp = 0, curr_qp;
>> int i, err;
>>
>> + if (prog && prog->xdp_adjust_head) {
>> + netdev_warn(dev, "Does not support bpf_xdp_adjust_head()\n");
>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> + }
>> +
>> if (virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO4) ||
>> virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO6)) {
>> netdev_warn(dev, "can't set XDP while host is implementing LRO, disable LRO first\n");
>>
>
> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>
>
> Thanks patch looks good. Alternatively we could push a "bug fix" to
> support the adjust header feature depending on how DaveM and MST feel
> about that. I don't have a strong opinion but I have the patch on my
> queue it just needs some more testing.
Cool! I thought to ask you what your plans are but then this patch is so
trivial I decided to just post it :) I'm perfectly happy with dropping it
for now and reposting after ~rc5 if needed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists