[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+sq2CfwTN5u6nhxriqWqoFxsYHdEYikbjBgMCL2YwNXpqyQ=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 18:35:20 +0530
From: Sunil Kovvuri <sunil.kovvuri@...il.com>
To: Satha Koteswara Rao <satha.rao@...iumnetworks.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@...ium.com>,
Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>,
rvatsavayi@...iumnetworks.com, derek.chickles@...iumnetworks.com,
philip.romanov@...ium.com,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/7] PF driver modified to enable HW filter support,
changes works in backward compatibility mode Enable required things in
Makefile Enable LZ4 dependecy inside config file
>
> #define NIC_MAX_RSS_HASH_BITS 8
> #define NIC_MAX_RSS_IDR_TBL_SIZE (1 << NIC_MAX_RSS_HASH_BITS)
> +#define NIC_TNS_RSS_IDR_TBL_SIZE 5
So you want to use only 5 queues per VF when TNS is enabled, is it ??
There are 4096 RSS indices in total, for each VF you can use max 32.
I guess you wanted to set no of hash bits to 5 instead of table size.
> #define RSS_HASH_KEY_SIZE 5 /* 320 bit key */
>
> struct nicvf_rss_info {
> @@ -255,74 +258,6 @@ struct nicvf_drv_stats {
> struct u64_stats_sync syncp;
> };
>
> -struct nicvf {
> - struct nicvf *pnicvf;
> - struct net_device *netdev;
> - struct pci_dev *pdev;
> - void __iomem *reg_base;
Didn't get why you moved this structure to the end of file.
Looks like an unnecessary modification.
> +static unsigned int num_vfs;
> +module_param(num_vfs, uint, 0644);
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(num_vfs, "Non zero positive value, specifies number of VF's per physical port");
So what if driver is built-in instead of module, I can't use TNS is it ?
>
> +/* Set RBDR Backpressure (RBDR_BP) and CQ backpressure (CQ_BP) of vnic queues
> + * to 129 each
Why 129 ??
RBDR minimum size is 8K buffers, why you want to assert BP when still
~4K buffers
are available. Isn't 4K a huge number to start asserting backpressure ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists